JUDGMENT COLLECTION ATTORNEY,
LAWYER, LOS ANGELES & CALIFORNIA
ENFORCEMENT:
Attorney integrated & operated

COMMUNITY PROPERTY VS. SEPARATE PROPERTY

Community property issues often arise in divorce proceedings and disputes after the death of one spouse.

These disputes can often be avoided by proper estate planning during the spouses’ joint lifetime. This may or may not involve probate proceedings.

Property acquired before marriage is separate and belongs to the spouse who acquired it.

Property acquired during marriage is presumed to belong to the community estate except if acquired by inheritance or gift, or by exchange for other separate property.

This definition leads to numerous issues that can be difficult to ascertain.

For instance, where a spouse owns a business when marrying, it is clearly separate at that time.

But if the business grows during the marriage, then what of the additional property acquired during marriage? Do they not result from labor of the spouses?

Were some of the funds that were used to pay for the property community funds while a portion of the funds were separate property?

Community property may consist of property of all types, including real property (“immovable property” in civil law jurisdictions)

and personal property (“movable property” in civil law jurisdictions) such as accounts in financial institutes, stocks, bonds, and cash.

A pension or annuity may have first been acquired before a marriage. But if contributions are made with community property during marriage, then proceeds are partly separate property and partly community property.

Upon divorce or death of a party to the marriage, there are rules for apportionment.

Stock options are also difficult to ascertain. A stock option is a right to purchase shares of a company at a fixed price.

Companies with growth potential sometimes award stock options as compensation to employees, during times when there is not enough money to pay a suitable salary.

By accepting a stock option for compensation, an employee invests his or her own trust in the belief that he or she will help make the company acquire a higher value.

Thereafter, the employee works and contributes value to the company. If the company later acquires a higher share valuation, then the employee may “cash in” his options by selling them at the fair market value.

The employee’s trust in this future value motivates his work without immediate compensation. That effort has value.

If the marriage is terminated before the shares are cashed in, then the parties must decide how to apportion the community property portion of the options.

This can be difficult. Case law precedents are not yet available for all situations involving stock options.

Judgment Collection Attorney, Lawyer
Los Angeles & California Enforcement.